Guest
01-28-2010, 09:07 AM
MGR Book 5, Article 9 and the 1803 Dogmas (see link below) for Priguni.
For the Postyanni, see the 1803 Dogmas (see link below).
http://www.molokane.org/molokan/Dogma/Do...ers.htm#28
Are there variations amongst different Molokan Church's? Of course, each church (both Postyanni and Priguni) were (and still are in Russia) from differing villages and towns which often took days to reach. So naturally they evolved differently to some degree, but the above mentioned references is largely accepted. There is no ecumenical movement (although the Postyanni have done this as of late to a minor degree) and amongst the Priguni any ecumenical movement, it is fiercely opposed for good or bad.
And finally Mr. Slevin, quit your blatant lies stating no one can give you a definition of a Molokan. You were given the above references many times and you chose to not allow them posted or only in part. You are merely posturing, just as you call your site "molokan.net" to lure unsuspecting individuals to your site to mislead. That is not ministry, its deception and we call all open to the Book of Genesis and read the very first account of deception between Eve and the Serpent and see how that turned out. If you refuse to accept the above references by outright dismissal or mince your own words to imply something else (backtracking) as you often tend to do when the heat gets on, your delusions or denial is not a problem for anybody else, it’s yours.
For the Postyanni, see the 1803 Dogmas (see link below).
http://www.molokane.org/molokan/Dogma/Do...ers.htm#28
Are there variations amongst different Molokan Church's? Of course, each church (both Postyanni and Priguni) were (and still are in Russia) from differing villages and towns which often took days to reach. So naturally they evolved differently to some degree, but the above mentioned references is largely accepted. There is no ecumenical movement (although the Postyanni have done this as of late to a minor degree) and amongst the Priguni any ecumenical movement, it is fiercely opposed for good or bad.
And finally Mr. Slevin, quit your blatant lies stating no one can give you a definition of a Molokan. You were given the above references many times and you chose to not allow them posted or only in part. You are merely posturing, just as you call your site "molokan.net" to lure unsuspecting individuals to your site to mislead. That is not ministry, its deception and we call all open to the Book of Genesis and read the very first account of deception between Eve and the Serpent and see how that turned out. If you refuse to accept the above references by outright dismissal or mince your own words to imply something else (backtracking) as you often tend to do when the heat gets on, your delusions or denial is not a problem for anybody else, it’s yours.
